<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Software in Software Development</title>
	<link>http://www.kleineikenscheidt.de/stefan/archives/2006/01/social-software-in-development-projects.html</link>
	<description>Integration Architecture and Engineering</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Stefan Kleineikenscheidt &#187; Javadoc Improvements</title>
		<link>http://www.kleineikenscheidt.de/stefan/archives/2006/01/social-software-in-development-projects.html#comment-143403</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 21:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kleineikenscheidt.de/stefan/archives/2006/01/social-software-in-development-projects.html#comment-143403</guid>
					<description>[...] Kathy Walrath has requested java developers to take part in a survey about good old Javadoc. I personally think that it lacks in community features, such as PHP&#8217;s &#8216;User Contributed Notes&#8217; (sample), better or easier editing features (maybe wiki-style), or even social software-like approaches. What do you think? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Kathy Walrath has requested java developers to take part in a survey about good old Javadoc. I personally think that it lacks in community features, such as PHP&#8217;s &#8216;User Contributed Notes&#8217; (sample), better or easier editing features (maybe wiki-style), or even social software-like approaches. What do you think? [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
